Showing posts with label Lists of landmark court decisions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lists of landmark court decisions. Show all posts

Sunday, 4 August 2013

Landmark ruling ends secrecy of family law

Parents Rights Blog
Date: 30 July 2013 01:53
Subject: [New comment] Landmark ruling ends secrecy of family law | The Times
To: Ian Draper - News Desk
Tweet: #AceNewsServices Email: News and Views Visit: Ace News Group 


New comment on Parents Rights Blog

in response to towardchange:
See on Scoop.it – Public Law Children Act Cases The cloak of secrecy is to be lifted from family courts in a landmark decision giving greater rights to tens of thousands of parents and their children every year.   Judgments determining custody battles, care orders and whether children should be rehomed will in future be […]
Munby plays a confidence trick !The cloak of secrecy in family courts will not be lifted simply
The cloak of secrecy will not be lifted just
because L.J Munby now says" judgements will in future be published unless there are compelling reasons not to do so .Who decides the reasons? Why the judges of course !
1:-Judges will still find "compelling reasons" not to publish dodgy judgements.Their judgements are 99% in favour of local authorities so parents' views will NOT be published
2:-The public(including grandparents and relatives of parents) will still be excluded from family courts.
3:-Mothers whose babies have been taken at birth will still be threatened with jail if they" go
public"Forced adoption will uniquely in UK continue unabated so babies are" lost for life"
4:- More children will still be taken for emotional abuse (or risk of it !) than those removed for both sex abuse and physical abuse added together;
5:-The media will still be forbidden to name parents who want to protest openly and publicly
6:-Children taken into care will still have their mobiles and laptops confiscated to isolate them from family and friends, Conversation with visiting parents will still be strictly censored
7:-Children in care receiving visits will still be forbidden to report abuse by fosterers,care workers,or social workers,and nearly half will still end up in jail or as sex workers.
8:-Agencies like Barnardos and N.F.A (founded by 2 social workers and sold for £130million+) will still make fortunes from recruiting fosterers and adoptive parents
9:- Foreign visitors who are single parents here for a holiday or to meet with relatives will be prevented from returning home their children will still be taken for forced adoption.
10:-Pregnant women fleeing the uk before any court proceedings start will still be tracked down in foreign countries by the SS who will snatch the children for forced adoption uk
11:-Judges will continue to issue injunctions forbidding parents who have committed no crime from contacting directly or indirectly their own children for periods of many years.
12:-PUNISHMENT WITHOUT CRIME will continue to be inflicted on parents, as experts (called hired guns in the Ireland report)predict risk of harm to children who are then adopted.
Nothing much will change…..



Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, 25 July 2013

Landmark ruling ends secrecy of family law - [New Comment] Parents Rights Blog - The Times

Date: 24 July 2013 13:31
Subject: [New comment] Landmark ruling ends secrecy of family law | The Times
Tweet at #AceNewsServices or email us at #News and Views 




Respond to this comment by replying above this line

New comment on Parents Rights Blog

in response to forcedadoption:
Towards change:- There just ain't no positives !
By the way when I first got involved in care proceedings. I sacked my first lawyer who I have on good authority took money, another lawyer called and told me everything and everything he states is true. Then with my second lawyer I found an old blog by MP Hodge and read her recommendations and followed them, got my court bundle and sacked them too. Lastly, Ian I found your blogs and followed your instructions to a T apart from kidnapping my child if nothing else prevails. I did not do the latter, because I believed in justice and the wrongs of the council are wide and far, even the ECHR states 'the matters I complain of are within their competence.
I took the right route instead of going on the run. It is too late for me and I must continue the fight, but I would advise single parents in particular of African origin not to even come to Northamptonshire and play proactive in any shape or form, because they do not like this and they hate black people. The latter is displayed without shame. The Trayvon Martin case has brought race into the public eye; which is a good thing and let us not forget Stephen Lawerence. Based on factual evidence you mess with Northamptonshire local establishment the first thing they will do is illegally kidnap your child/ren. Please note, Northamptonshire police & social services, including Northampton Borough Council are labelled the worst in the country for good reason.
Ian, I still do not agree with your views about the secrecy issue, but I do understand your outlook fully and you do present a case to support this and so do I. There has to be some degree of optimism and using whatever crumbs they give us as tools to fight back. If not we all might as well say, everybody give up and take the law into their own hands and do not leave any hostages.
Ian at long last it is a pleasure conversing with you, for now I will bid you goodbye.
Reply    Comments
Want less email? Modify your Subscription Options.

Enhanced by Zemanta